Skip to main content

Press statement on FOBTOB nation-wide strike for 20% pay rise






=====================================================================================================================================================================================================================

Femi Aborisade
Legal Practitioner
=================================
Press Statement

ASSOCIATION OF FOOD, BEVERAGE AND TOBACCO EMPLOYERS (AFBTE):
NEGOTIATE WITH FOBTOB AND GRANT PAY RISE OUT OF PROFIT RISE

It is absurd that the Association of Food, Beverage and Tobacco Employers (AFBTE) whose members have incontrovertibly recorded appreciable rise in profit has been resisting granting a 20% pay rise to members of the Food, Beverage and Tobacco Senior Staff Association (FOBTOB). The AFBTE should therefore meet the demands of FOBTOB in order to end the current indefinite nationwide strike which FOBTOB was compelled to commence on 11th December 2017.
In spite of the economic difficulties in Nigeria, the Food, Beverage and Tobacco industry has been witnessing growth in production and profit levels as the sample statements below show.
For example, in the Unaudited Results for the six months ending 30th September 2017 for International Breweries PLC, the Company Secretary/General Counsel stated as follows:
“The Board is happy to note that despite the challenges in the operating environment, there are improvements in revenue growth, operating profit and profit before tax compared with the same period in the prior year”.

If the employers are happy as the above quoted official statement categorically shows, we call on the employers association, the AFBTE, to equally make their staff happy by granting the 20 percent salary increase demanded by FOBTOB.
Also, in the Nestle Nigeria PLC’s Unaudited Results for the period ended 30th September 2017, the Company Secretary/Legal Adviser, Bode Ayeku, Esq. stated in part that:
“… Net profit for the period has increased substantially due to internal cost saving initiatives, operating efficiency and a significant reduction in the net financing costs.”.

Again, we reiterate that it is an unacceptable contradiction that the employers expressly acknowledge rise in net profits but they are resisting conceding pay rise to the workers who made it possible for them to realise the profit rises in the industry.
We therefore unequivocally support the demand of FOBTOB for a 20% pay rise. If the membership remains united, victory is certain. We call on workers and their unions, nationally and internationally, to show solidarity with FOBTOB. Employers support each other nationally and internationally. Workers and their unions must also show international solidarity for other workers in struggle. Workers, by the nature of their struggles, are internationalists.
We also call on the trade union movement to mount pressure on the Federal Government to adopt policies to ensure that employers fulfill a social responsibility pact such that in situations of proven net profit rises, employers ameliorate societal economic agony of their employees by granting wage and salary rises rather than accentuating social and industrial conflicts and crises by the refusal to grant contractual bi-annual collective bargaining for wage reviews in this particular industry

Femi Aborisade, Esq.
12th December 2017

Comments

  1. laj13 December 2017 at 03:23

    Justified demand can only be resolved by doing justice to the workers. Solidarity forever

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPERATIVES OF JUSTICIABILITY OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN NIGERIA: AN ANALYSIS OF CHAPTER II OF THE 1999 CONSTITUTION AND JUDICIAL ATTITUDES

  Outline The following outline has been adopted in discussing this topic: ·          Introduction ·          What are the provisions of Chapter II of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (CFRN ) 1999? ·          The essence of the Chapter II provisions ·          Two Schools of Thought on Chapter II ·          The non-justiciability constitutional provision ·          The pro-justiciability provisions o    The constitutional pro-justiciability provisions o    Statutory pro-justiciability provisions: The African Charter on
1 comment
Read more

GRATUITY AND RETIREMENT BENEFITS AND THE PENSION REFORM ACT 2004

Femi Aborisade Senior Principal Lecturer Department of Business Administration & Management Studies The Polytechnic, Ibadan & Centre for Labour Studies (CLS) Email: aborisadefemi@yahoo.com   Introduction Internationally, pension reform has been a common feature of public sector financial reforms since the 1990s. According to the OECD (2007), in Europe , the reforms have led to increased retirement age but a reduction in terminal benefits. Similar reforms have been embarked upon in the developing countries resulting in throwing poorer segments of the society into harsher economic conditions as responsibilities for old age care are transferred from the state to the individuals. Within the context of pension reforms on a global scale, this paper critically examines Nigeria ’s Pension Reform Act 2004. Though the particular interest of this workshop appears limited to provisions relating to gratuity under the Act, it is assumed that participants wo...
4 comments
Read more

ON CREATION AND/OR RECOVERY OF GRAZING RESERVES BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

There is no justifiable legal basis for the project of the Federal Government to recover or create grazing reserves across NIGERIA. That project can only be attained by military violence against unarmed people. It is therefore a declaration of avoidable war against the peaceful Nigerian people. It would create and fan embers of mutual ethnic hatred, conflict and avoidable bloodshed. I call on ordinary people to reject and resist the grazing reserves project of the Federal Government. All 36 state Governors, nationally and regionally, have resolved that open grazing is unsustainable. It causes avoidable bloody clashes between herders and farmers. Rather, ranching should be embraced. I do not see how the Federal Government can achieve it's project of creating or recovering grazing preserves across Nigeria.  Firstly, the Grazing Reserves Act of 1964 was limited to the Northern Region; it was not applicable to the other regions. Secondly, section 1 of the Land Use Act vests land owners...
Post a Comment
Read more