Skip to main content

ON CREATION AND/OR RECOVERY OF GRAZING RESERVES BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


There is no justifiable legal basis for the project of the Federal Government to recover or create grazing reserves across NIGERIA. That project can only be attained by military violence against unarmed people. It is therefore a declaration of avoidable war against the peaceful Nigerian people. It would create and fan embers of mutual ethnic hatred, conflict and avoidable bloodshed. I call on ordinary people to reject and resist the grazing reserves project of the Federal Government.

All 36 state Governors, nationally and regionally, have resolved that open grazing is unsustainable. It causes avoidable bloody clashes between herders and farmers. Rather, ranching should be embraced.

I do not see how the Federal Government can achieve it's project of creating or recovering grazing preserves across Nigeria. 

Firstly, the Grazing Reserves Act of 1964 was limited to the Northern Region; it was not applicable to the other regions.

Secondly, section 1 of the Land Use Act vests land ownership in the territory of the state in the Governor for the benefit of all Nigerians. Therefore, administration of land in the territory of a state is in the control of the state government, not the Federal Government.

Thirdly, Nigeria now operates the 1999 Constitution. Section 297(2), of the Constitution vests Land ownership (and by extension, administration of land) in the territory of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) in the Federal Government. Beyond the FCT, Abuja, the Federal Government lacks the power to control or administer land. The FGN has to approach, beg or request for land from the State Government and it is at the discretion of the state government to grant or refuse such requests by the Federal Government. By section 44 of the Constitution, the Federal Government lacks the power to compulsorily acquire land not granted by the consent of a state government. Therefore, there is no way the Federal Government can force its grazing reserves creation or recovery on the state Governments. That would be unconstitutional and unlawful. That would be arbitrary.

By the combined provisions of the Land Use Act, particularly section 1 of the Act earlier referred to, and section 4(7) (a) of the Constitution, which vests the power to make laws on items not expressly included in the Exclusive legislative list, in the State Government, land administration in the territory of each state is vested in the State Government, for the benefit of all Nigerians, in manners provided by law.

Based on the foregoing, I support the governors who have declared their opposition to grazing reserves creation or recovery. I support the ban on open grazing. It should be enacted into law and enforced. Ordinary people must insist that NIGERIA is governed according to.predetermined laws and not the whims and caprices of those in control of the Federal Government.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPERATIVES OF JUSTICIABILITY OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN NIGERIA: AN ANALYSIS OF CHAPTER II OF THE 1999 CONSTITUTION AND JUDICIAL ATTITUDES

  Outline The following outline has been adopted in discussing this topic: ·          Introduction ·          What are the provisions of Chapter II of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (CFRN ) 1999? ·          The essence of the Chapter II provisions ·          Two Schools of Thought on Chapter II ·          The non-justiciability constitutional provision ·          The pro-justiciability provisions o    The constitutional pro-justiciability provisions o    Statutory pro-justiciability provisions: The African Charter on

GRATUITY AND RETIREMENT BENEFITS AND THE PENSION REFORM ACT 2004

Femi Aborisade Senior Principal Lecturer Department of Business Administration & Management Studies The Polytechnic, Ibadan & Centre for Labour Studies (CLS) Email: aborisadefemi@yahoo.com   Introduction Internationally, pension reform has been a common feature of public sector financial reforms since the 1990s. According to the OECD (2007), in Europe , the reforms have led to increased retirement age but a reduction in terminal benefits. Similar reforms have been embarked upon in the developing countries resulting in throwing poorer segments of the society into harsher economic conditions as responsibilities for old age care are transferred from the state to the individuals. Within the context of pension reforms on a global scale, this paper critically examines Nigeria ’s Pension Reform Act 2004. Though the particular interest of this workshop appears limited to provisions relating to gratuity under the Act, it is assumed that participants wo...