INCLUSIVE
SOCIOECONOMIC SPACE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
By
Femi
Aborisade, Esq[1].
Introduction
This paper is
structured as follows:
- Definition of concepts – “inclusive society/social inclusion” and “sustainable development”.
- Elements of an inclusive society
- Transparency
- Constitutional Elements of an inclusive society.
- Challenges to building an inclusive and sustainable Nigerian society.
- Non-justiciability of Chapter 2 of the Constitution.
- Corruption.
- Resistance to paying a living wage.
- Climate change as a challenge to sustainable development.
- Respect for Fundamental Rights, Rule of Law and Obedience of Court Orders as Preconditions for an Inclusive and Sustainable Development.
- Conclusion
What
is meant by social inclusion?
The concept of social
inclusion refers to multi-dimensional processes aimed at creating conditions
which enable full and active participation in the society. In other words,
efforts at attaining social inclusion are efforts to consciously prevent social
exclusion. Social exclusion occurs when individuals or groups are unable to
participate, wholly or partially, in all aspects of the society in which they
live.
The World Summit for
Social Development (Copenhagen, 1995)[2]
defines an inclusive society as a “society for all in which every individual,
each with rights and responsibilities, has an active role to play”. In the
literature, it has been opined that “a society for all” can only be based on
respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, including respect for
cultural and religious diversity, respect for special needs of vulnerable and
disadvantaged groups, promotion of policies to reduce income inequality and eliminate
poverty.
From the standpoint of
the World Summit for Social Development (Copenhagen, 1995), a key element of an
inclusive society is guaranteed universal
access to the resources, rights and services which can enable
socio-economic cum political participation in society. These include the right
to work, public infrastructure, services and basic needs such as public
schools, hospitals, water supplies, public/social housing, public libraries,
recreational centres, resource centres with internet facilities, basic income,
food, etc. Access of ordinary people to basic services and facilities will tend
to eliminate feelings of frustration and exclusion from the benefits of common
patrimony.
World Summit for Social
Development (Copenhagen, 1995) emphasis that an inclusive society must be based
on the fundamental rights value and principle.
What
is “sustainable development”?
There is no
single acceptable definition of “sustainable development”. The definition that
appears common in the literature is that offered by the International Institute
for Sustainable Development (IISD), which defines “sustainable development” as
“development that meets the needs of the present, without compromising future
generations to meet their own needs. Central to the IISD definition is the
concern with “need” - the critical needs
of the world’s poor, which ought to be given overriding priority.
The concept of
sustainable development is therefore concerned with how to manage societal
resources today in order to guarantee the welfare of ordinary people at the
present in such a way that does not disturb the welfare of future generations.
A critical concern
is that in Nigeria, a government that is unable to manage resources for the
satisfaction of current generation can hardly be bothered with future
generations. Governments that are unable
to pay wages as and when due can hardly spare a thought for the future.
ELEMENTS OF AN INCLUSIVE SOCIETY
There are
several elements of an inclusive society. I intend to discuss two (2) in this
section of the paper. They are transparent and constitutional elements.
Transparent elements of an inclusive
society
An
institutionalised transparent governance process may involve the following
elements:
- Making it constitutionally mandatory for public sector officers (particularly those occupying elective offices and the top appointed officers, such as Ministers, Commissioners, judges, board members, directors and management cadre in all government bodies and state owned enterprises) to publicly declare their assets and interests annually.
- A commission such as the Code of Conduct Bureau should be created to administer the register of interests for senior public officers. The registers should be audited each year by the relevant Auditor General.
- The registers of interests and assets should be accessible to the public, e.g. by being put online and in libraries that are accessible to the public.
- Public projects to be executed through direct labour or Public-Public Partnerships, nationally or internationally.
- Where public projects have to be awarded to private contractors, such should be monitored by democratic bodies involving representatives of local communities, trade unions and professional bodies, in addition to the oversight role of the legislature.
- All procurement notices, received bids and contract awards to be published on local notice boards and on the internet.
- All procurement boards to include local representatives of trade unions and professional bodies.
- All service establishments, for example, public hospitals, health centres, primary schools, etc to publish accounts of money and goods received and how the money was spent, each month
- The Federal Inland Revenue Service and state inland revenue services should report full details of the revenue they collect each month and the tax paid by all rich individuals (with monthly incomes above
N5million and/or around ten times average per capita GDP) should be published on the internet. - Daily publication of earnings from sale of crude oil in the international market.
- All public sector salaries (particularly those of the executive and legislative arms of government) to be published on local notice boards and on the internet.
- Elected public officers to be on national minimum wage, provided incidentals are reimbursed. Alternatively, no elected public officer should earn more than 10 times the minimum wage so that inequality is within the context of the inequality of the human fingers.
Constitutional Elements Of An Inclusive
Society
The Constitution
of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, as amended aims at building an
inclusive society that is needs-based or rights-based.
The
socio-economic rights constitutionally guaranteed include:
- Right to General welfare and security : the security and welfare of the people shall be the primary purpose of government (S. 14(2)( (b);
- Provision of Transportation: adequate facilities for movement of people, goods and services throughout the Federation (S. 15(3)(a);
- Provision of Physiological needs: suitable and adequate shelter, suitable and adequate food, reasonable national minimum living wage, old age care and pensions, and unemployment, sick benefits and welfare of the disabled are provided for all citizens (S. 16(2)(d);
- Right to employment or unemployment allowance: section 16 (2)(d) and s. 17(3)(a), CFRN, 1999 - all citizens, without discrimination on any group whatsoever, [shall] have the opportunity for securing adequate means of livelihood as well as adequate opportunity to secure suitable employment. Currently in the UK, there is an unemployment allowance of £57.90 per week for under 25.
- Conditions of work: [it shall be ensured that] conditions of work are just and humane, and that there are adequate facilities for leisure and for social, religious and cultural life (S. 17(3)(b); Also, the state is to put in place policies to ensure that the health, safety and welfare of all persons in employment are safeguarded and not endangered or abused (S. 17(3)(c);
- Right to health, including sick benefits/allowance: adequate medical and health facilities for all persons (Ss. 16(2)(d) & 17(3) (d), CFRN, 1999. In the UK, medical care is free at the point of need, regardless of the health condition.
- Gender sensitive rights - Right to equal pay: for equal work without discrimination on account of sex, or on any other ground whatsoever (S. 17(3) (e);
- Right of the child: children, young persons and the aged are [entitled to be] protected against any exploitation whatsoever, and against moral and material neglect (S. 17(3)f);
- Right to public assistance in conditions of need (S. 17(3)(g);
- Right to education, from cradle to grave: free, compulsory and universal primary education; free secondary, university education and adult literacy programme (S. 18(3)(a) to (d). Currently, in the UK, there is a students’ loan scheme of £14,000 per annum. Out of this, a typical university student pays £9,000 tuition fees and uses £5,000 for his or her upkeep. It should be noted that the student is only required to pay back the loan only if s/he is employed and earns above £21,000 salaries per year. Otherwise, the loan is not required to be paid back.
- Right to a safe environment: The State shall protect and improve the environment and safeguard the water, air and land, forest and wild life of Nigeria (S. 20).
In order to ensure that the State has the capacity to fund
socio-economic rights that require budgetary provision to execute, S. 16
of Chapter 2 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, as
amended[3],
provides essentially for state ownership
and control of the major sectors of
the economy. That the state shall:
- manage and operate the major sectors of the economy, without prejudice to equally operating or participating in other sectors of the economy (S. 16(1)(c)
- protect the right of every citizen to engage in any economic activities outside the major sectors of the economy, even though any person may still participate in the major sectors of the economy (S. 16(1)(d);
- not operate the economic system in such a manner as to permit the concentration of wealth or the means of production and exchange in the hands of few individuals or of a group (S. 16(2)(c);
- ensure that the material resources of the nation are harnessed and distributed as best as possible to serve the common good; (S. 16(2)(b);
- control the national economy in such manner as to secure the maximum welfare, freedom and happiness of every citizen on the basis of social justice and equality of status and opportunity (S. 16(1)(b).
CHALLENGES TO BUILDING AN INCLUSIVE AND SUSTAINABLE
NIGERIAN SOCIETY
Some of the key
challenges in building an inclusive and sustainable society include the
following:
- Non-justiciability of Chapter 2 of the Constitution.
- Corruption.
- Resistance to paying a living wage.
- Climate change as a challenge to sustainable development.
- Respect for Fundamental Rights, Rule of Law and Obedience of Court Orders as Preconditions for an Inclusive and Sustainable Development.
NON-JUSICIABILITY OF CHAPTER 2 OF THE
CONSTITUTION
The change in the
governance of Nigeria that is required is that the wealth of Nigeria must be
used to satisfy the basic needs of ordinary people rather than being used for the
satisfaction of the greed of the rulers. The wealth of Nigeria may be used to
meet the welfare of ordinary people if Chapter 2 is made justiciable. But the predominant judicial attitude
is that Chapter 2 is not justiciable. An urgent campaign issue is to mount
pressurize to ensure that all constitutional impediments making Chapter 2
non-justiciable are removed.
The change that is
required in the governance of Nigeria lies in ensuring a constitutional amendment that would make it a crime for any government
official who fails to implement Chapter 2 of the 1999 Constitution. Chapter
2 is the most important part of the Constitution.
The campaign to make
chapter 2 justiciable may be enhanced where it is appreciated that the predominant
judicial attitude that Chapter 2 is not justiciable, is politics, not law and
that there are several provisions in the same Constitution that provide for
justiciability of Chapter 2. In other words, a community reading of all
relevant sections of the Constitution make chapter 2 justiciable. These
sections are:
- S. 6(6)(c), CFRN, 1999
- S. 1(1), CFRN, 1999.
- Section 13, CFRN, 1999.
- section 224, CFRN, 1999, and
- Item 60(a) of the Exclusive Legislative List.
- The Oaths sworn to by the President, Vice President, Governor, Deputy Governor, Minister, Commissioner, Special Adviser and members of the National Assembly and House of Assembly of the State includes “striv[ing] to preserve” Chapter 2 of the Constitution.
S.6(6)(C) Does Not Completely Foreclose
Justiciability of Chapter II It allows
justiciability or enforcement of Chapter 2 if there is provision for
enforcement in any other section of the Constitution.
S.
1(1), CFRN, 1999, as amended, proclaims the supremacy and
bindingness of the Constitution and Chapter 2 being part of the Constitution,
is therefore binding.
Section
13 provides that all authorities and persons exercising legislative, executive
or judicial powers ‘shall’ observe and apply Chapter II.
Section
224 provides that:
‘The programme as well as the aims and objects of a political
party shall conform with the provisions of Chapter II of this Constitution’ (S.
224, CFRN, 1999).
Item 60(a) of the Exclusive Legislative List places
responsibility on the Federal Government to establish and regulate ‘authorities
for the Federation or any part thereof - to promote and enforce the observance
of the Fundamental Objectives and Directive Principles contained in this
Constitution’
CORRUPTION
Research
findings have shown that inequality and corruption are positively correlated.
Countries with high levels of corruption tend also to have high levels of
inequality. Therefore, the labour
movement should argue that the fight against corruption must simultaneously be
linked with measures to reduce inequality.
The labour
movement should adopt a broad perception of corruption which suggests that
corruption is the abuse of public power for private benefit/profit. In this
regard, violation of the constitution, rules and regulation for private benefit
is a form of corruption, which should equally be punished. Unless corruption is
defined in this broad perspective, the fight against corruption may itself be
dubious and corrupt.
Our proposed
definition of corruption brings privatization policy within the framework of corrupt
acts. As we have shown above, the Constitution of the Federal Republic of
Nigeria, 1999, as amended, provides that the economic system shall not be operated in such a manner as to permit the concentration of wealth or
the means of production and exchange in the hands of few individuals or of a
group (CFRN, 1999, S. 16(2)(c).
Within the framework of the Constitution, the labour
movement should resist the planned privatization of the refineries. Government
should take the fight against corruption to the oil and gas subsector. Those
who have diverted the investments meant to carry out Turn Around Maintenance
(TAM) over the decades should be brought to justice. Establish more refineries
and carry out repairs of the existing ones. Ensure the refineries acquire the
capacity to refine the crude for both domestic consumption and export
Indeed, reversing the privatization of the 1,500
public enterprises already privatized at all levels of government is the
‘change’ the labour movement has a historic responsibility to fight for.
Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB)[4]
& Privatisation
Sections 136(5),
324 (4), 324 (5) of the Petroleum Industry Bill represent the essence of
the primary goal of the PIB as presently formulated - to implement a neoliberal
privatization agenda under various guises – sale or divestiture of Federal
Government’s interests and concession.
S. 136 (1) establishes the
Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited, otherwise called ‘’the National
Oil Company’’. It shall be a limited liability company and shall be the
successor company to the assets and liabilities of the Nigerian National
Petroleum Corporation, NNPC. Section 136(4) provides that ownership of the
National Oil company shall be vested solely in the Federal Government of
Nigeria at the time of incorporation. But S. 136 (5) provides that the
Federal Government may at any time after two years from the date of
incorporation decide to divest itself of any amount of shares in the
National Oil Company for sale to the Nigerian public on the Nigerian Stock
Exchange.
S. 324(1) also provides
for the establishment of National Transport Logistics Company which
shall be vested with ownership of the products pipelines and depot systems
currently owned by the Petroleum Products Marketing Company, and
ownership of the gas transportation pipelines currently owned by the Nigerian
Gas Company.
Concession as a Form of Privatization:
While S. 324 (2)
provides that the National Transport Logistics Company shall be wholly
owned by the Nigerian State, S. 324 (4) provides that the products pipelines
and depot systems shall be divided into segments and each segment shall be concessioned
out to facility management companies who shall be in charge of the
management and operation of the said products pipelines and depot systems.
Licensing as a Form of Privatization:
S. 324 (5) provides that
the gas transportation pipelines system shall be licensed out to a gas
facility management company.
From the
foregoing, privation of NNPC which successive regimes could not do executively
is what is intended to be achieved legislatively through the PIB.
Let us recall
that in the twilight of the regime of former President Obasanjo, there was a
rushed cheap sale of two out of the four state-owned refineries, the Port
Harcourt and Kaduna refineries, as well as some other national assets. The
nationwide strike of June 2007, involving the two oil workers unions, the
National Union of Petroleum and Natural Gas Workers (NUPENG) and Petroleum and
Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (PENGASSAN), compelled the then
newly elected regime of President Yar’ Adua to reverse the sale.
The Nigerian
labour movement should embrace the programme of “Nigeria not for sale” drawn up
in the early ‘80s by the NLC.
RESISTANCE TO PAYMENT OF A LIVING
WAGE
We support the demand for an upward review of the National
Minimum Wage to N56,000 minimum wage as a demand to facilitate an inclusive and
sustainable society.
Gas flaring
Among other leakages that government has a responsibility to
block, we draw attention to research findings that have shown that apart from
the disastrous effects of gas flaring on climate change, the economic loss of
gas flaring to the country could range from $2.5 – $17 billion yearly[5].
$200
billion US dollars in UAE
According to Senator
Sheu Sani, speaking in his capacity as the Chairman, Senate Committee on
Foreign and Domestic Debts, “Over $200 billion Dollars are stashed away from
Nigeria to Dubai alone. I am not talking
about estates and bonds and other securities bought with Nigeria stolen money.”
Looting as antithetical to sustainable
development
Femi
Falana, SAN, in a letter dated 8/4/16, addressed to the Minister of Finance,
has listed about 18 sources of looted funds, urging the the
Federal Government to muster the political will and courage to recover the
aforesaid withheld or stolen wealth of not less than $200 billion belonging to
the Nigerian people. They include the following:
S/N
|
Source
|
Amount
|
1.
|
Relying on the National Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative
(NEITI) that established, from five cycles of independent audit reports covering 1999-2012, the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC),
some oil companies and certain agencies of the federal government had
withheld $20.2 billion for the
Federation Account.
|
$20.2bn
|
2.
|
Bail
outs to banks by the CBN (2006, $7 billion); (2008, N600 billion or $4
billion).
|
$11bn
|
3.
|
On September 6, 2016 the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation
(NNPC) announced that arrangements had been concluded to recover the sum of $9.6 billion in over-deducted tax benefits
from joint venture partners on major capital projects and oil swap contracts.
|
$9.6bn
|
4.
|
Outstanding sum due from Mobil
Producing Nig. Unlimited. Sometime in 2009, Mobil Producing Nigeria
Unlimited applied to the federal government for the renewal of three oil
blocks. The NNPC asked Mobil to pay the sum of $2.5 billion for the renewal
of the licences. But without any reason, Mobil paid only $600 million .
|
$1.9bn
|
5.
|
$4bn unlawfully collected from CBN
between 1998-2014 by the Federal Government out of over $5 billion stolen
from the vaults of the CBN by the late General Sani Abacha.
|
$4bn
|
6.
|
Unpaid royalty running into hundreds
of millions of dollars owed by the oil and gas companies
operating in the in the Deep Offshore and Inland Basin since the 15 year
break (from 1999) allowed for non-payment of royalties ended
in 2014, by virtue of the Deep Offshore Inland Sharing Contract Decree
enacted in 1999 by the Abdulsalami Abubakar military junta for the benefit of
oil and gas companies operating in the Deep Offshore and Inland Basin.
|
Hundreds of
millions of dollars
|
7.
|
The contract awarded to ZTE, (a Chinese company) in 2009 by the
federal government for the construction of CCTV cameras in Abuja and Lagos, which was not performed. Recover
thy of the contract sum of $470 million is logical and equitable.
|
$470 million
|
8.
|
In the Appropriation Act, 2011 the sum of N245 billion was earmarked for fuel subsidy. In violation of the
budget law the federal government fraudulently paid out N2.5 trillion ($16 billion) to a cabal of fuel importers.
|
$16bn
|
9.
|
On July 6, 2012 the Supreme
Court of Nigeria set aside the fraudulent sale of the federal government
owned Aluminium Smelting Company of Nigeria (ASCON) located in Akwa Ibom
state to RUSAL for $250 million and directed the company be sold to BFIG, the
winner of the bid for $410 million. The federal government should direct the
National Council of Privatisation to comply with the judgment. The federal
government stands to realise an additional sum of $160 million from the sale
|
$160m
|
10.
|
For contravention of the law on compulsory registration of all SIM
cards the NCC imposed a fine of $5.2 billion on MTN last year. Based on plea
by the MTN management and the intervention of the Government of South Africa
the fine was reduced to $3.9 billion
out of which MTN has paid the paltry sum of $250 million. Since MTN has
withdrawn the suit challenging the payment of the fine the federal
government should take steps to ensure the prompt payment of the outstanding
balance of $3.65 billion
|
$3.65 billion
|
11.
|
Estimated
recoverable amount from oil theft over a 10-year period based
on current findings by a team of lawyers commissioned by thee Federal
Government under the Jonathan Administration
|
$100bn
|
12.
|
Amount that the NNPC agreed was not remitted to
the Federation account (between January
2012 and July 2013) after reconciliation by the Federal Government
instead of $20bn alleged by the former CBN Governor, then Mallam Sanusi
Lamido
|
$10.8bn
|
13.
|
Rising from its monthly meeting at Abuja on September 17, 2015 the
National Economic Council accused the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation
(NNPC) of failing to remit N3.8 trillion to the Federation Account under the
Jonathan administration. The Council set up a committee of 3 state governors
to trace the missing fund. Last month, the Auditor-General of the Federation indicted the NNPC for withholding
N3.2 trillion from the Federation Account in 2014. The Revenue
Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission has said that “ the total
indebtedness of the NNPC to the Federation Account is N4.9 trillion (or
($32.6bn).
|
$32.6bn
|
14.
|
A week before
the 8/4/16 date on Mr Falana’s letter, a firm of auditors
revealed that out of the sum of $6.4 billion realised from the sale of crude
oil and gas by the Federal Government in the first quarter of 2016 the NNPC
remitted only $2 billion to the Federation Account and withheld the sum of
$4.2 billion. Up till now the NNPC has not explained how much of the sum
of $4.2 billion was spent on its operations in 3 months.
|
$4.2bn
|
15.
|
The arms fund diverted to personal accounts
from the office of the National Security Adviser under President Jonathan
|
$8bn
|
16.
|
Halliburton
scandal
|
About $200m
|
17.
|
sale of the OPM 245 for $1.3 billion otherwise known as malabu oil deal.
|
$1.3bn
|
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF GOVERNORS AND DEPUTY GOVERNORS
PENSION LAWS IN LAGOS, OYO AND KWARA STATES[6]
Those
who earn kleptocratic governors’ pensions who are also earning fat salaries and
allowances either as Ministers or legislators have no moral right to argue that
downturn in the economy cannot accommodate N56,000 National Minimum Wage.
State
|
Lagos
state[7]
|
Kwara
State[8]
|
Oyo
State[9]
|
Rate
of Pension
|
Pension
for life at the rate equivalent to the annual basic salary of the incumbent
governor or deputy governor, as the case may be.
|
(similar
to the provision in the Lagos State law but
with the clarification that the rate is equivalent to 100% of the annual basic salary of the incumbent Governor and Deputy
Governor and other benefits as provided by the Revenue
Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission.
|
(similar
provision as that of Lagos State Law with the additional clarification that “Salary” shall include allowances.
|
Retroactive
effect
|
The
law is mandatorily applicable to “any person who held office as an elected
Governor or Deputy Governor from the
year 1967”. The law makes use of the word, “shall” – such persons “shall
be entitled to this Pension Scheme.”
|
||
Review
Period
|
To
be reviewed every 5 years or when
there is salary review of the political office holders by the Revenue
Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission in line with section 210 (3) of
the CFRN, 1999.
|
Similar
provision to that of Lagos State law[10].
|
|
Accommodation
|
(i).
One residential house each for the Governor and Deputy Governor at any
location of their choice in Lagos State, and (ii) one residential house in the Federal Capital Territory for
the Governor on 2 consecutive terms.
|
(i).
A well furnished five (5) Bedroom Duplex for the Governor; (ii). A well
furnished four (4) Bedroom Duplex for the Deputy Governor (at any location of
their choice in the State).
|
|
House
Maintenance
|
10%
of Annual basic salary
|
10%
of annual basic salary.
|
|
Transport
|
(a).
Three cars for the Governor and in addition 1 Pilot and 2 backup cars to be
replaced every 3 years (i.e. 6 cars every 3 years)
(b).
Two cars for the Deputy Governor and in addition 1 Pilot and 1 backup car to
be replaced every 3 years (i.e. 4 cars every 3 years).
|
(i).
2 cars for the Governor and in addition 1 Pilot car to be replaced every 3
years. (ii). 1 car for the Deputy Governor and in addition 1 pilot car to be
replaced every 3 years (i.e. 3 and 2 cars for the former Governor and former
deputy Governor, every 3 years, respectively).
|
|
Car
Maintenance
|
30%
of annual basic salary
|
(Similar
provision as that of Lagos State law).
|
|
Furniture
|
300%
of annual basic salary.
|
300%
of annual basic salary, payable every four years enbloc.
|
300% of the annual
basic salary[11]
|
Domestic
Staff
|
Cook,
Steward, Gardener and other domestic staff who shall be pensionable.
|
Cook,
Steward, Gardener and two other domestic staff who shall be pensionable.
|
|
Staff
Provision (Administrative)/Personal Assistant
|
25%
of annual basic salary.
|
(i).
1 Administrative officer, (ii) 1 Personal Secretary, and 25% of annual basic
salary.
|
|
Medical
|
Free
medical treatment for the Governor and Deputy Governor and members of their
immediate families
|
(similar
provision to that of Lagos State Law).
|
|
Security
|
Two
State Security Service (SSS) details for the Governor and one female officer;
one SSS detail for the Deputy Governor; Eight policemen (four each for house
and personal security) for the Governor; Two policemen (one each for house
and personal security) for the deputy Governor.
|
To
be provided as listed below: 2 State Security Service (SSS) details for the
Governor and one female officer; 1 SSS detail for the Deputy Governor; Eight
policemen for the Governor; 2 policemen for the deputy Governor.
|
|
Drivers
|
The
drivers shall be pensionable.
|
(Similar
provision as that of Lagos State Law).
|
|
Entertainment
|
10%
of annual basic salary.
|
(Similar
provision as that of Lagos State law).
|
|
Utility
|
20%
of annual basic salary.
|
(Similar
provision as that of Lagos State law).
|
|
Leave
allowance
|
10%
of annual basic salary[12].
|
||
Severance
allowance
|
300% of the annual
basic salary[13].
|
||
Mode
of budgetary allocation
|
Pension
granted shall be a charge upon the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the State
|
(Similar
provision as that of Lagos State law).
|
(Similar
provision as that of Lagos State law).
|
It should be noted that:
- The Pension Laws being implemented predominantly in the states (and particularly in the private sector) is a contributory pension scheme as against the non-contributory, Pay As You Go (PAYG) scheme being enjoyed by the Governors and Deputy Governors for life.
- There is no pension scheme or minimum income guarantee scheme for citizens who were not employed in the public service;
- Section 124(1) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria provides that the Pension Law governing payment of pension for certain public officers[14] shall not exceed the amount as shall have been determined by the Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission[15].
- The same state governors who seek to continue to loot public treasury through kleptocratic pension laws are champions of regionalism for the sole purpose of decentralizing terms and conditions of work, including minimum wage, so they can pay only what each state can afford.
CLIMATE CHANGE
AS A CHALLENGE TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: THE PASTORALIST AND SEDENTARY
FARMERS’ CONFLICTS
The pastoralist
herdsmen/farmers conflict with the sedentary farmers across the country should
fundamentally be seen as the inability of the capitalist ruling class to take
society forward on the basis of capitalism. The reaction of the labour movement
should strive to unite rather than deepen the division along ethnic lines.
First, it is important
to understand that the pastoralist/sedentary farmers’ conflicts are partly
products of the effects of climate change. For example, Lake Chad, which was
once one of Africa’s largest water bodies, is fast disappearing due to climate
change and overuse of its water resources. The Lake’s water level and size have
shrunk by 95% of what it was in the 1960s. Its surface area has decreased from
a peak of 25,000 square kilometers to about 1,350 Sq. km. today[16].
The drying up of Lake Chad is having severe negative impacts on the means of
livelihood of populations that depend on it. Farmers and cattle herders tend to
move southward in search of greener pastures which movement results in
competition for land resources leading to violent clashes that we are
witnessing across the country. Others have moved to the Southern States
engaging in menial jobs in the informal sector to make a living. The
impoverishing effects of climate change on Lake Chad should be seen as one of
the root causes of pastoralist/sedentary farmers clashes and the festering Boko
Haram phenomenon.
However, the Federal
Government has a responsibility to protect lives and bring the herdsmen
committing heinous murderous acts to justice.
In the literature,
elements of an inclusive society include:
- Recognition of entitlement to rights and obligations to respect the rights of others - every individual is entitled to a fair and equal treatment just as every individual is also obligated to share responsibility for the rights of others.
- Government has responsibility to bring rights violators to justice: there must be no room for impunity – wherein wrongs are committed and no one is made to be responsible for his or her actions.
In their submission to
the President Jonathan CONFAB, both the NLC and TUC suggested the development
of ranching as solution to
pastoralist grazing. Ranching could enable the young herdsmen to have time for
education and participate more productively in the society.
GAS FLARING AS CHALLENGE TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
The World Bank
estimates that one sixth of global gas flaring occurs in Nigeria. This means
that Nigeria is the second largest gas
flaring country in the world, after Russia. This causes great harm to the
environment by raising climate warming.
It is also
estimated that for Nigeria, the power generation potential of the flared gas is
approximately equal to the current level of electricity generation. In other
words, if the oil companies are forced to stop gas flaring, electricity
generation capacity could easily be doubled.
The
labour movement has no choice but take more active interests in climate change
campaigns in the interest of sustainable development, as defined above. One of
the key issues of climate change is stopping gas flaring.
RESPECT FOR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, RULE OF
LAW AND OBEDIENCE OF COURT ORDERS AS PRECONDITIONS FOR AN INCLUSIVE AND
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Within the context of
the concepts of inclusive society and sustainable development, the repression
of the universally recognized rights of the Shiites and pro-Biafra protesters
ought to be condemned unconditionally by the labour movement. The Kaduna State
Government has publicly stated that 347 shiites who were shot dead by the
Military were given mass burial. Their leader, El-ZakZakky, the leader of the Shiites has been in
incarceration since December 2015 without trial for any specific offence and
without anybody, including his lawyers, being allowed to have access to him.
The pro-Biafra Movement
has also alleged that several of their supporters were shot dead, burnt alive
while others were either injured or arrested and detained.
International law
recognizes the right to internal form of self determination of peoples. Articles 1 and 55 of the UN Charter
(that is UN Constitution) expressly recognize the rights of peoples to
self-determination. For the avoidance of any doubt, the UN Charter defines
'peoples' as a group of human beings, who may or may not comprise States or
nations.
The relevant provisions
of the UN Charter and the African Union are reproduced below.
Article
1 sub (2) of the UN Charter provides:
The purposes of the United Nations
are:
(2). To develop friendly relations
among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and
SELF-DETERMINATION of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to
strengthen universal peace.
Also Article 20(1) of the African Charter,
which has been domesticated,
provides:
All peoples shall have the right to
existence. They shall have the unquestionable and inalienable right to
self-determination. They shall freely determine their political status and
shall pursue their economic and social development according to the policy they
have freely chosen.
Disobedience of court
orders by several arms of government has also become the order of the day.
The
labour movment, which is often compelled to employ the protest culture, has a
duty to resist violent repression of democratic rights, regardless of who may
be the victim. No government should be allowed to get away with denial of
democratic rights.
I thank you all
for your attention.
Femi Aborisade, Esq.
[1]
Being paper presented at the pre-May Day 2016 Lecture held at Airport Hotel,
Lagos on 30th April 2016.
[2]
Cited in http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/egms/docs/2009/Ghana/inclusive-society.pdf
accessed as at 29/4/16.
[3] This Chapter is titled: Fundamental Objectives and Directive Principles of State
Policy. It
consists of 12 sections, from section 13 to section 24.
[4] The analysis here is based on
the provisions of the PIB as contained in the version that I accessed as at
June 2010.
[6]
This analysis was incorporated into a paper (“The Imperatives of June
12 and Its Implication on Yoruba Politics”) I had delivered at “June 12
Colloquium” organized by Yoruba Academy in partnership with Afenifere Renewal
Group (ARG) on 12 June 2014 at Drapers’ Hall, Institute of African Studies,
University of Ibadan.
[7]
See Public Office Holder (Payment of Pension) Law 2007.
[8]
See Kwara State Governor and Deputy Governor (Payment of Pension) Law, 2010.
[9]
See Oyo State Pension (Governor and Deputy Governor) Law, 2004.
[10]
The five-yearly review is made subject to S. 210 (3), which provides for
review every five years or together with any state civil service salary
reviews, whichever is earlier.
[11]
See Annex 1 to the Remuneration Package for Political Office Holders Amendment
law, 2007.
[12]
See Annex 1 to the Remuneration Package for Political Office Holders Amendment
law, 2007.
[13]
See Annex 1 to the Remuneration Package for Political Office Holders Amendment
law, 2007.
[14]
Governor, Deputy Governor, Auditor General for the State, Chairman and members
of the State Civil Service Commission, the State Independent Electoral
Commission and the State Judicial Service Commission.
[15]
The rogue pension laws are likely to be at variance with what the Revenue
Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) provides. But details of
such variance can only be the subject matter of another paper.
Comments
Post a Comment