Skip to main content

TABULATED COMPUTATION OF THE EFCC CHARGES IN THE CBN CASES BEFORE THE FHC IN IBADAN



SUMMARIZED COMPUTATION OF MONETARY VALUE IN THE CHARGES IN THE CBN CASES PENDING BEFORE THE FEDERAL HIGH COURT, IBADAN, INVOLVING ALLEGATIONS OF CURRENCY MUTILATION SCAM IN THE COURSE OF BRIQUETTING EXERCISES IN SUIT Nos FHC/IB/31C – 37C/2015.






S/N
OFFENCE/AMOUNT INDUCED
DIFFERENCE
BANK
ALLEGED FORGED DOCUMENT
ALLEGED POSSESSION IN EXCESS OF LEGITIMATE EARNINGS
1.
FHC
IB
31C
2015
*CBN CLAIMED TO BE INDUCED TO CREDIT FBN WITH N1,250,000,000 AS AGAINST N389,296,535

*CBN CLAIMED TO BE INDUCED TO CREDIT FBN WITH N1,070,000,000 AS AGAINST N296,902,680

*CBN CLAIMED TO BE INDUCED TO CREDIT FBN WITH N180,000,000 AS AGAINST N92,393,855

*N860,703,465




*N773,097,320




*N87,606,145
FIRST
BANK
OF
NIG.
FIRST BANK OF NIGERIA PLC SPECIE PACKING SLIP WITH DIFFERENT DATES.
(CBN CLAIMED TO HAVE CREDITED THE BANK WITH N10,000,000 ON DIFFERENT OCCASIONS BASED ON THE FORGED SLIP)
*ACCUSED PERSONS ALLEGEDLY SHARED THE SUM OF N773,097,320

*ACCUSED PERSONS ALLEGEDLY SHARED N87,606,145

*NUMEROUS ASSETS IN EXCESS OF LEGITIMATE EARNINGS

*VARIOUS BANK ACCOUNTS WITH EXCESSIVE CREDITS
2.
FHC
IB
32C
2015
* CBN CLAIMED TO BE INDUCED TO CREDIT WEMA BANK WITH N1,391,280,190 AS AGAINST N338,719,810

* CBN CLAIMED TO BE INDUCED TO CREDIT WEMA BANK WITH N1,730,000,000 AS AGAINST N333,521,810

* CBN CLAIMED TO BE INDUCED TO CREDIT WEMA BANK WITH N10,000,000 AS AGAINST N4,802,000

*N1,052,560,380




*N1,396,478,190




*N5,198,000
WEMA BANK PLC
WEMA BANK OF NIGERIA PLC SPECIE PACKING SLIP WITH DIFFERENT DATES 
(CBN CLAIMED TO HAVE CREDITED THE BANK WITH 10,000,000 ON DIFFERENT OCCASIONS BASED ON THE FORGED SLIP)
*ACCUSED PERSONS ALLEGEDLY SHARED THE SUM OF N1,386,478,190

*ACCUSED PERSONS ALLEGEDLY SHARED THE SUM OF N4,802,000

*THE ACCUSED PERSONS ALLEGEDLY OWNED ASSETS SUCH AS LANDS, HOUSES, BOREHOLE RIGS, FILLING STATIONS IN EXCESS OF THEIR LEGITIMATE EARNINGS. 
3.
FHC
IB
33C
2015











 

4.
FHCIB
34C
2015
* CBN CLAIMED TO BE INDUCED TO CREDIT FCMB WITH N115,000,000 AS AGAINST N58,331,900

* CBN CLAIMED TO BE INDUCED TO CREDIT FCMB WITH N100,000,000 AS AGAINST N46,307,400

* CBN CLAIMED TO BE INDUCED TO CREDIT FCMB WITH N15,000,000 AS AGAINST N12,024,500




*ALLEGED CONSPIRACY AND INDUCEMENT TO CREDIT ZENITH BANK WITH N1,060,000,000 AS
AGAINST N159,431,700 (FALSE ENTRY IN CASH BOOK)


*N56,668,100



*N53,692,600




*N2,975,500





*N900,568,300
FIRST CITY MONUMENT BANK (FCMB)












ZENITH BANK
FCMB PLC SPECIE PACKING SLIP WITH DIFFERENT DATES. 
(CBN CLAIMED TO HAVE CREDITED THE BANK WITH 10,000,000 ON DIFFERENT OCCASIONS BASED ON THE FORGED SLIP)










ZENITH BANK PLC SPECIE PACKING SLIP WITH DIFFERENT DATES. 
(CBN CLAIMED TO HAVE CREDITED THE BANK WITH 10,000,000 ON DIFFERENT OCCASIONS BASED ON THE FORGED SLIP)
*ACCUSED PERSONS ALLEGEDLY SHARED THE SUM OF N53,692,600

*ACCUSED PERSONS ALLEGEDLY SHARED N2,975,500










*ACCUSED PERSONS ALLEGEDLY SHARED THE SUM OF N900,568,300
5.
FHC
IB
35C
2015
* ALLEGED CONSPIRACY AND INDUCEMENT TO CREDIT STERLING BANK/EQUITORIAL TRUST BANK WITH N610,000,000 AS
AGAINST N98,696,700 (FALSE ENTRY IN CASH BOOK)



*N511,303,300
STERLING BANK / EQUITORIAL TRUST BANK
STERLING BANK OF NIGERIA SPECIE PACKING SLIP WITH DIFFERENT DATES. 
(CBN CLAIMED TO HAVE CREDITED THE BANK WITH 10,000,000 ON DIFFERENT OCCASIONS BASED ON THE FORGED SLIP)
* ACCUSED PERSONS ALLEGEDLY SHARED THE SUM OF N511,303,300
6.
FHC
IB
36C
2015
*ALL ACCUSED ALLEGED TO HAVE ABUSED THEIR OFFICE BY DESTROYING BOXES MARKED “COUNTED AUDITED DIRTY” FILLED WITH NEWSPAPER IN PLACE OF N10,000,000 AND CONVERTING THE SUM OF N10,000,000 TO THEIR PERSONAL USE


CBN

ACCUSED PERSONS ALLEGEDLY OWNED ASSETS TO WIT: N10,000,000 MEANT FOR THE BRIQUETTING EXERCISE.
7.
FHC
IB
37C
2015
* ALLEGED CONSPIRACY AND INDUCEMENT TO CREDIT ECO BANK PLC WITH N490,000,000 AS
AGAINST N79,789,900 (FALSE ENTRY IN CASH BOOK)


*N410,210,100
ECO BANK PLC
ECO BANK PLC SPECIE PACKING SLIP WITH DIFFERENT DATES. 
(CBN CLAIMED TO HAVE CREDITED THE BANK WITH 10,000,000 ON DIFFERENT OCCASIONS BASED ON THE FORGED SLIP)
*N410,210,100

*ACCUSED PERSON OWNED ASSETS TO WIT: SHOPPING COMPLEX, A HOUSE AND UNDISCLOSED SUMS IN BANK ACCOUNTS
SUMMATION OF DIFFERENCES IN CHARGES 31C -34C = N5,189,548,000

SUMMATION OF DIFFERENCES IN CHARGES 35C -37C = N931,513,400

ALLEGED SUMS SHARED (NOT INCLUDED IN THE DIFFERENCE) = N1,391,280,190

TOTAL = N7,512,341,590




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPERATIVES OF JUSTICIABILITY OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN NIGERIA: AN ANALYSIS OF CHAPTER II OF THE 1999 CONSTITUTION AND JUDICIAL ATTITUDES

  Outline The following outline has been adopted in discussing this topic: ·          Introduction ·          What are the provisions of Chapter II of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (CFRN ) 1999? ·          The essence of the Chapter II provisions ·          Two Schools of Thought on Chapter II ·          The non-justiciability constitutional provision ·          The pro-justiciability provisions o    The constitutional pro-justiciability provisions o    Statutory pro-justiciability provisions: The African Charter on
1 comment
Read more

GRATUITY AND RETIREMENT BENEFITS AND THE PENSION REFORM ACT 2004

Femi Aborisade Senior Principal Lecturer Department of Business Administration & Management Studies The Polytechnic, Ibadan & Centre for Labour Studies (CLS) Email: aborisadefemi@yahoo.com   Introduction Internationally, pension reform has been a common feature of public sector financial reforms since the 1990s. According to the OECD (2007), in Europe , the reforms have led to increased retirement age but a reduction in terminal benefits. Similar reforms have been embarked upon in the developing countries resulting in throwing poorer segments of the society into harsher economic conditions as responsibilities for old age care are transferred from the state to the individuals. Within the context of pension reforms on a global scale, this paper critically examines Nigeria ’s Pension Reform Act 2004. Though the particular interest of this workshop appears limited to provisions relating to gratuity under the Act, it is assumed that participants wo...
4 comments
Read more

ON CREATION AND/OR RECOVERY OF GRAZING RESERVES BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

There is no justifiable legal basis for the project of the Federal Government to recover or create grazing reserves across NIGERIA. That project can only be attained by military violence against unarmed people. It is therefore a declaration of avoidable war against the peaceful Nigerian people. It would create and fan embers of mutual ethnic hatred, conflict and avoidable bloodshed. I call on ordinary people to reject and resist the grazing reserves project of the Federal Government. All 36 state Governors, nationally and regionally, have resolved that open grazing is unsustainable. It causes avoidable bloody clashes between herders and farmers. Rather, ranching should be embraced. I do not see how the Federal Government can achieve it's project of creating or recovering grazing preserves across Nigeria.  Firstly, the Grazing Reserves Act of 1964 was limited to the Northern Region; it was not applicable to the other regions. Secondly, section 1 of the Land Use Act vests land owners...
Post a Comment
Read more